Labeotropheus candipygia

Labeotropheus candipygia Pauers & Phiri, 2023

Adicionar o seu Fotografias e vídeos
Imagem do Google
Image of Labeotropheus candipygia
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Cichlidae.

Classificação / Nomes Nomes comuns | Sinónimos | Catalog of Fishes(Género, Espécies) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Cichliformes (Cichlids, convict blennies) > Cichlidae (Cichlids) > Pseudocrenilabrinae
Etymology: Labeotropheus: Latin, labeo = one who has large lips + Greek, tropaion = defeat, a memorial of a fighting war, trophy; because of their specialized teeth were such an obvious feeding adaptation (Ref. 45335)candipygia: The specific epithet combines the Latin adjective for white or brilliant, candidum, and the new Latin noun pygia, meaning rump or buttocks; this refers to the bright white or bluish-white ventrum of the males (Ref. 128773).

Ambiente: milieu / zona climática / intervalo de profundidade / gama de distribuição Ecologia

; Água doce bentopelágico. Tropical

Distribuição Territórios | Áreas FAO | Ecossistemas | Ocorrências | Mapa dos pontos | Introduções | Faunafri

Africa: Malawi.

Tamanho / Peso / Idade

Maturidade: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 9.7 cm SL macho/indeterminado; (Ref. 128773)

Descrição breve Chaves de identificação | Morfologia | Morfometria

Espinhos dorsais (total) : 16 - 19; Raios dorsais moles (total) : 7 - 10; Espinhos anais: 3; Raios anais moles: 7 - 9. Diagnosis: Labeotropheus candipygia differs from all other species of Labeotropheus by the typical nuptial colouration of the males: male L. candipygia have a distinct iridescent silvery-blue or silvery-white ventral surface; this unique colouration extends from the branchiostegals to the anus in all individuals, and will extend to through the caudal peduncle to the ventral attachment of the caudal fin in some individuals; above this silvery-white ventrum, males are ochreous orange, which covers most of the head and can extend to the base of the dorsal fin, and extends posteriorly through the caudal peduncle to the base of the caudal fin, or they will be a dull greyish blue with ochreous-orange highlights on the scales of the dorsum; both colour patterns feature a brilliantly iridescent white dorsal fin that has ochreous-orange tips, and patches of iridescent blue, black, orange, or red pigmentation (Ref. 128773). Labeotropheus candipygia differs from the slender-bodied Labeotropheus, L. trewavasae, L. simoneae, L. chirangali, except L. rubidorsalis, due to its greater body depth, 32.0-38.6% of standard length vs. 26.3-33.4% in L. trewavasae, 26.9-30.8% in L. simoneae, 26.6-33.2% in L. chirangali; it does have a generally deeper body than L. rubidorsalis, although the ranges overlap, 31.6-36.1% in L. rubidorsalis; It differs from L. rubidorsalis primarily in the nuptial colouration of the males, but also by a generally shorter snout length, 19.7-33.9% of head length vs. 29.8-42.7%, a longer snout pad, 11.3-19.2% of head length vs. 10.3-14.4%, and a greater number of tooth rows in the upper jaw, 4-6 vs. 3-4 (Ref. 128773). Labeotropheus candipygia differs from the other robust-bodied Labeotropheus primarily via male nuptial colouration (Ref. 128773). While the morphometric and meristic values largely overlap with the other robust Labeotropheus, there are some distinctions: Labeotropheus candipygia has a greater distance between the tip of the snout and the origin of the dorsal fin, 32.2-36.8% of standard length vs. 30.8-33.8%, a shorter distance between the insertion of the dorsal and anal fins, 13.9-16.7% of standard length vs. 16.5-17.4%, and fewer teeth in the left side of the lower jaw, 23-24 vs. 31-43, than L. fuelleborni; it typically has a shorter snout, 19.7-33.9% of head length vs. 25.2-40.8%, greater rostral length, 35.1-49.7% of head length vs. 22.9-43.7%, and a larger snout pad, 11.3-19.2% of head length vs. 7.4-16.1%, than L. artatorostris; it has a narrower interorbital width, 32.7-42.8% of head length vs. 40.1-43.5%, and typically fewer infraorbital neuromasts, 13-33 vs. 25-40, than L. chlorosiglos; it differs from L. obscurus due to a shorter distance between the insertions of the dorsal and anal fins, 13.9-16.7% of standard length vs. 15.8-17.8%, a shorter distance between the insertion of the dorsal fin and the origin of the anal fin, 27.4-31.7% of standard length vs. 30.3-33.2%, a typically shorter lower jaw, 21.5-39.4% of head length vs. 27.6-40.4%, more rows of teeth in the upper jaw, 4-6 vs. 3-4, more teeth in the left half of the lower jaw, 23-34 vs. 20-26, and fewer infraorbital neuromasts, 13-33 vs. 22-46 (Ref. 128773).


Biologia     Glossário (ex. epibenthic)

Ciclo de vida e comportamento de acasalamento Maturidade | Reprodução | Desova | Ovos | Fecundidade | Larvas

Referência principal Carregar as suas referências | Referências | Coordenador : Kullander, Sven O. | Colaboradores

Pauers, M.J. and T.B. Phiri, 2023. Six new species of Labeotropheus (Cichliformes: Cichlidae) from the Malawian shore of Lake Malawi, Africa. Ichthyology & Herpetology 111(2):264-292. (Ref. 128773)

Categoria na Lista Vermelha da IUCN (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Ameaça para o homem

  Harmless





Utilização humana

Pescarias: sem interesse
FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

Mais informação

Ecologia Trófica
Produtos alimentares (presas)
Composição da dieta
Consumo alimentar
Rações alimentares
Predadores
Ecologia
Ecologia
Dinâmica das populações
Parâmetros de crescimento
Idades / tamanhos máximos
Comprimento-peso rel.
Comprimento-comprimento rel.
Frequência de comprimento
Conversão de massa
Recrutamento
Abundância
Ciclo de vida
Reprodução
Maturidade
Maturidade/Rel. das guelras
Fecundidade
Desova
Agregações de desova
Ovos
Desenvolvimento dos ovos
Larvas
Dinâmica larvar
Distribuição
Territórios
Áreas FAO
Ecossistemas
Ocorrências
Introduções
BRUVS - Vídeos
Anatomia
Área branquial
Cérebro
Otólitos
Fisiologia
Composição corporal
Nutrientes
Consumo de oxigénio
Tipo de natação
Velocidade de natação
Pigmentos visuais
Som de peixe
Doenças e Parasitas
Toxicidade (LC50s)
Genética
genoma
Genética
Heterozigotia
Hereditariedade
Diversidade genética
Relacionado com o ser humano
Sistemas de aquacultura
Perfis para aquacultura
Estirpes
Casos de Ciguatera
Selos, moedas, diversos.
Divulgação
Colaboradores
Taxonomia
Nomes comuns
Sinónimos
Morfologia
Morfometria
Fotografias
Referências
Referências

Ferramentas

Relatórios especiais

Descarregue XML

Fontes da internet

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | Consultar FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: Género, Espécies | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | Árvore da vida | Wikipedia: ir para, procurar | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Registo zoológico

Estimativas baseadas em modelos

Índice de diversidade filogenética (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = 0.5005   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight: a=0.01445 (0.00671 - 0.03113), b=2.99 (2.82 - 3.16), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
Nível Trófico (Ref. 69278):  3.3   ±0.4 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resiliência (Ref. 120179):  Elevada, tempo mínimo de duplicação da população menor que 15 meses (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Vulnerabilidade da pesca (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (10 of 100). 🛈