You can sponsor this page

Hemibates koningsi Schedel & Schliewen, 2017

Upload your photos and videos
Google image
Image of Hemibates koningsi
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Cichlidae.

Classification / Names Common names | Synonyms | Catalog of Fishes(genus, species) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

Teleostei (teleosts) > Cichliformes (Cichlids, convict blennies) > Cichlidae (Cichlids) > Pseudocrenilabrinae
Etymology: Hemibates: Greek, hemi = the half + Greek, bates, baino = to go, to walk (Ref. 45335);  koningsi: The species is named for the first person who recognized the new Hemibates species as a distinct phenotype, Ad Konings, in appreciation of the inspiration to many cichlidophiles that arose from his continued popular and scientific contributions (Ref. 117350).

Environment: milieu / climate zone / depth range / distribution range Ecology

Freshwater; pelagic; depth range 40 - 150 m (Ref. 117350), usually 40 - 60 m (Ref. 117350). Tropical

Distribution Countries | FAO areas | Ecosystems | Occurrences | Point map | Introductions | Faunafri

Africa: southern part of Lake Tanganyika from around Mpulungu and the Chituta Bay (Ref. 117350).

Size / Weight / Age

Maturity: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 21.7 cm SL male/unsexed; (Ref. 117350)

Short description Identification keys | Morphology | Morphometrics

Dorsal spines (total): 14 - 15; Dorsal soft rays (total): 13 - 15; Anal spines: 3; Anal soft rays: 12 - 14; Vertebrae: 33 - 34. Diagnosis: Adult males of Hemibates koningsi can be distinguished from H. stenosoma, the only congener, by a flank colour pattern of four to seven black vertical bars, two to three flank-scales wide, on the anterior flank region and five horizontal bands, one to two, rarely three flank-scales high, on the posterior flank region vs. black blotches of variable number, size and shape at the anterior part of the flanks and five, rarely four, horizontal bands in H. stenosoma; they can further be distinguished by the fourth horizontal band, counted from dorsal to ventral, starting below pectoral fin base sometimes before and extending to caudal fin base in H. koningsi vs. normally ending well before caudal fin base in H. stenosoma; moreover, both species exhibit a black band on dorsal fin membrane along the dorsal-fin base, which is however wider and more pronounced in H. koningsi males (Ref. 117350). Females as well as males of H. koningsi can be unambiguously separated from H. stenosoma by their longer lower pharyngeal jaw, 37.6-38.2% of head length vs. 27.8-32.5%, with a characteristically curved keel, distinctive bulge ventrally of the keel, which contrasts with the more or less straight keel of H. stenosoma, which is only rounded towards the tip; meristics and measurements of Hemibates koningsi overlap with those of H. stenosoma, but H. koningsi on average has fewer gill rakers on the first gill arch, 33-37 vs. 35-43; it tend to have longer lower jaws, 44.0-47.1% of head length vs. 39.22-45.9%, longer upper lips, 32.6-36.7% of head length vs. 27.6-33.6%, and longer lower lips, 34.5-37.8% of head length vs. 30.1-36.0% (Ref. 117350).

Biology     Glossary (e.g. epibenthic)

This species appears to be epibenthic (Ref. 117350).

Life cycle and mating behavior Maturities | Reproduction | Spawnings | Egg(s) | Fecundities | Larvae

Main reference Upload your references | References | Coordinator : Kullander, Sven O. | Collaborators

Schedel, F.D.B. and U.K. Schliewen, 2017. Hemibates koningsi spec. nov: a new deep-water cichlid (Teleostei: Cichlidae) from Lake Tanganyika. Zootaxa 4312(1):92-112. (Ref. 117350)

IUCN Red List Status (Ref. 130435)


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Threat to humans

  Harmless





Human uses

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

More information

Trophic ecology
Food items
Diet compositions
Food consumptions
Food rations
Predators
Ecology
Ecology
Population dynamics
Growths
Max. ages / sizes
Length-weight rel.
Length-length rel.
Length-frequencies
Mass conversions
Recruitments
Abundances
Life cycle
Reproduction
Maturities
Fecundities
Spawnings
Spawning aggregations
Egg(s)
Egg developments
Larvae
Larval dynamics
Distribution
Countries
FAO areas
Ecosystems
Occurrences
Introductions
BRUVS - Videos
Anatomy
Gill areas
Brains
Otoliths
Physiology
Body compositions
Nutrients
Oxygen consumptions
Swimming type
Swimming speeds
Visual pigment(s)
Fish sounds
Diseases / Parasites
Toxicities (LC50s)
Genetics
Genetics
Electrophoreses
Heritabilities
Human related
Aquaculture systems
Aquaculture profiles
Strains
Ciguatera cases
Stamps, coins, misc.
Outreach
Collaborators
Taxonomy
Common names
Synonyms
Morphology
Morphometrics
Pictures
References
References

Tools

Special reports

Download XML

Internet sources

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | BOLDSystems | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: genus, species | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GenBank: genome, nucleotide | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | MitoFish | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | Tree of Life | Wikipedia: Go, Search | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Zoological Record

Estimates based on models

Phylogenetic diversity index (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = No PD50 data   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Trophic level (Ref. 69278):  3.5   ±0.4 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resilience (Ref. 120179):  High, minimum population doubling time less than 15 months (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Fishing Vulnerability (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (17 of 100).