You can sponsor this page

Enteromius radari Kisekelwa, Snoeks, Decru, Schedel, Isumbisho & Vreven, 2022

Upload your photos and videos
Google image
Image of Enteromius radari
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Cyprinidae.

Classification / Names Nombres comunes | Sinónimos | Catalog of Fishes(Género, Especie) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Cypriniformes (Carps) > Cyprinidae (Minnows or carps) > Smiliogastrinae
Etymology: Enteromius: Greek, enteron = intestine + Greek, myo, mys = muscle (Ref. 45335);  radari: This species is dedicated to Dr. Honoris Radar Nishilu, former chief manager of the Kahuzi-Biega National Park (2008-2016), in recognition of his commitment to and support for biodiversity assessments and scientific research in the park and particularly for the investigations (Ref. 128600).

Environment: milieu / climate zone / depth range / distribution range Ecología

; agua dulce bentopelágico; pH range: 6.5 - 7.0. Tropical; 23°C - 23°C (Ref. 128600)

Distribución Países | Áreas FAO | Ecosistemas | Ocurrencias, apariciones | Point map | Introducciones | Faunafri

Africa: Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Tamaño / Peso / Age

Maturity: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 8.7 cm SL macho / no sexado; (Ref. 128600)

Short description Claves de identificación | Morfología | Morfometría

Espinas dorsales (total) : 0; Radios blandos dorsales (total) : 10 - 11; Espinas anales: 0; Radios blandos anales: 8; Vértebra: 31 - 33. Diagnosis: Within the Congo basin, Enteromius radari belongs to the group of sawfin minnows with a thickened last unbranched dorsal-fin ray and is thereby distinguished from all congeners from the Congo basin with a soft last unbranched dorsal-fin ray (Ref. 128600). It differs from other species with a weakly thickened spine, notably E. mediosquamatus, E. taeniurus and E. tomiensis, by its serrations on the spine vs. unserrated dorsal spine (Ref. 128600). Within the group of the sawfin minnows, having a thickened spine with serrations, it differs from E. afrovernayi, E. apleurogramma, E. oligogrammus and E. petchkovskyi by its complete lateral line vs. incomplete; in addition, it differs from E. apleurogramma and E. oligogrammus by its weakly thickened dorsal spine vs. a strongly thickened, and further by its lower number of lateral line scales from E. afrovernayi, 22-26 vs. 29-32; it differs from the remaining sawfin minnows by its weakly thickened, thin dorsal spine of which only the middle part is weakly serrated, vs. a strongly thickened, stout spine, well serrated over almost its entire length in E. ansorgii, E. eutaenia, E. kerstenii as well as E. tangandensis, E. mattozi, E. miiolepis, E.neumayeri, E. pellegrini and E. trinotatus; it can further be distinguished from E. pellegrini by its lower number of lateral line scales, 22-26 vs. 28-30; it can be distinguished from E. afrohamiltoni, E. lukindae, E. neumayeri, E. paludinosus, E. trimaculatus and E. vanderysti by its lower number of lateral line scales, 22-26 vs. 29-33, 29-30, 30-31, 34-39, 30-36 and 29, respectively (Ref. 128600). Furthermore, based on its colour pattern, E. radari can be distinguished from E. eutaenia, E. devosi, E. miolepis and E. luikae by the presence of three or four blotces along the flanks, situated just above the lateral line, and interconnected or not by a narrow, sometimes inconspicuous, black stripe vs. a permanent, continuous, black mid-lateral band; E. radari can be distinguished from E. guirali and E. machadoi as well, by the presence of these black markings along the body flanks vs. absence; E. radari can be distinguished from E. multilineatus and E. trinotatus also, by the above black marking character vs. a large black, mid-lateral band on the body but with several thin longitudinal black bands above and below this main band, and three elongated, narrow black spots respectively (Ref. 128600). Within the group of Enteromius species with a weakly thickened, serrated spine, it differs from E. chicapaensis and E. chiumbeensis by its higher number of lateral line scales, 22-26 vs. 21-23 and 20-21, respectively; in addition, it differs from E. chicapaensis by the presence of a series of three or four black blotches just above the mid-lateral line of the body vs. absence; furthermore, within this group it differs from E. holotaenia and E. martorelli by a series of three or four black blotches just above the mid-lateral line of the body vs. a continuous black band; finally, E. radari differs clearly from E. janssensi by the absence of cephalic pitlines vs. presence, and by the presence of blotches vs. indistinct black band larger on the anterior part and narrowing at mid-body level, by its lower number of lateral line scales, 22-26 vs. 24-27, and its lower number of circumpeduncular scales, 10-12 vs. 12 (Ref. 128600).

Biología     Glosario (por ej. epibenthic)

Found in shallow areas, about 1 m of depth, of small streams, about 1-10 m width, under tree canopy cover; the bottom is composed of either silt, sand, gravel, or a combination with mud and detritus (Ref. 128600).

Life cycle and mating behavior Maturities | Reproducción | Spawnings | Egg(s) | Fecundities | Larva

Main reference Upload your references | Referencias | Coordinador | Colaboradores

Kisekelwa, T., J. Snoeks, E. Decru, F.B.D. Schedel, M. Isumbisho and E. Vreven, 2022. A mismatch between morphological and molecular data in lineages of Enteromius (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) from the Lowa basin (East Democratic Republic of the Congo: DRC) with the description of a new species. Syst. Biodivers. 20(1,2135630):1-22. (Ref. 128600)

IUCN Red List Status (Ref. 130435)


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Threat to humans

  Harmless





Human uses

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

Más información

Trophic ecology
componentes alimenticios
Diet compositions
Food consumptions
Food rations
Despredadores
Ecology
Ecología
Population dynamics
Growths
Max. ages / sizes
Length-weight rel.
Length-length rel.
Length-frequencies
Mass conversions
Recruitments
Abundances
Life cycle
Reproducción
Maturities
Fecundities
Spawnings
Spawning aggregations
Egg(s)
Egg developments
Larva
Dinámica larvaria
Distribution
Países
Áreas FAO
Ecosistemas
Ocurrencias, apariciones
Introducciones
BRUVS - Videos
Anatomy
Gill areas
Cerebros
Otolitos
Physiology
Body compositions
Nutrients
Oxygen consumptions
Tipo de natación
Swimming speeds
Visual pigment(s)
Sonidos de peces
Diseases / Parasites
Toxicities (LC50s)
Genetics
Genética
Electrophoreses
Heritabilities
Human related
Aquaculture systems
Perfiles de acuicultura
Razas
Ciguatera cases
Stamps, coins, misc.
Outreach
Colaboradores
Taxonomy
Nombres comunes
Sinónimos
Morfología
Morfometría
Imágenes
References
Referencias

Herramientas

Special reports

Download XML

Fuentes de Internet

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | BOLDSystems | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: Género, Especie | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GenBank: genome, nucleotide | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | MitoFish | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | Árbol de la vida | Wikipedia: Go, búsqueda | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Expediente Zoológico

Estimates based on models

Phylogenetic diversity index (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = No PD50 data   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Nivel trófico (Ref. 69278):  3.0   ±0.3 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resiliencia (Ref. 120179):  Alto, población duplicada en un tiempo mínimo inferior a 15 meses (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Fishing Vulnerability (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (10 of 100).