You can sponsor this page

Labeobarbus nzadinkisi Vreven, Musschoot, Decru, Wamuini Lunkayilakio, Obiero, Cerwenka & Schliewen, 2018

Upload your photos and videos
Google image
Image of Labeobarbus nzadinkisi
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Cyprinidae.

Classification / Names Tên thường gặp | Các synonym ( Các tên trùng) | Catalog of Fishes(Giống, Các loài) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Cypriniformes (Carps) > Cyprinidae (Minnows or carps) > Torinae
Etymology: nzadinkisi: The current name of the Inkisi River is derived from its local appellation 'Nzadi I nkisi' in Kikongo (Kintandu/Kindibu dialects), referring to the missionaries who threw the 'mi-nkisi', fetish object containing a certain nkisi spirit, in the river in their effort to convert the local populations to Christianity; species name referring to this new name of the river basin to which it appears endemic; in addition, by its reference to the nkisi-objects, indirectly referring to the enigmatic hybridization complex of which this species is a parental species; a noun in apposition, making its gender ending unchangeable (Ref. 127934).

Environment: milieu / climate zone / depth range / distribution range Sinh thái học

; Nước ngọt Sống nổi và đáy. Tropical

Sự phân bố Các nước | Các khu vực của FAO | Các hệ sinh thái | Những lần xuất hiện | Point map | Những chỉ dẫn | Faunafri

Africa: Inkisi River, Lower Congo River basin above the Zongo Falls, in Democratic Republic of the Congo (Ref. 127934).

Bộ gần gũi / Khối lượng (Trọng lượng) / Age

Maturity: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 20.5 cm SL con đực/không giới tính; (Ref. 127934)

Short description Khóa để định loại | Hình thái học | Sinh trắc học

Các tia vây lưng cứng (tổng cộng) : 0; Các vây lưng mềm (tổng cộng) : 14 - 16; Tia cứng vây hậu môn: 0; Tia mềm vây hậu môn: 9; Động vật có xương sống: 37 - 38. Diagnosis: Within the Congo basin Labeobarbus nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. altipinnis, L. ansorgii, L. batesii, L. brauni, L. cardozoi, L. caudovittatus, L. dartevellei, L. fasolt, L. habereri, L. humphri, L. iphthimostoma, L. iturii, L. jubbi, L. longidorsalis, L. longifilis, L. lufupensis, L. macroceps, L. macrolepidotus, L. macrolepis, L. mawambi, L. mawambiensis, L. mirabilis, L. nanningsi, L. oxyrhynchus, L. paucisquamatus, L. stappersii, L. trachypterus, L. upembensis and L. wittei by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. leleupanus by its low number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 45-47; from L. tropidolepis and L. platyrhinus by its low number of scales between the lateral line and the dorsal and ventral midline, 4.5-5.5 and 5.5 vs. 7.5-8.5 and 7.5-9.5 in L. tropidolepis and 6.5-7.5 and 6.5-8.5 in L. platyrhinus, and from the latter by its low number of circumpeduncular scales as well, 12-14 vs. 16-18; from L. robertsi by the absence of papillae on the anterior edge of the lower jaw vs. with numerous well identifiable papillae; from L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. prognathous; from L. altianalis, L. gestetneri and L. somereni by its lack of both pairs of barbels vs. two pair of well-developed barbels; and from L. pellegrini by its short prepelvic length, 46.5-48.5% of standard length vs. 50.6%, its short pelvic length, 17.9-21.0% of standard length vs. 21.8%, and its large eye, 29.1-34.6% of head length vs. 27.1% (Ref. 127934). Further, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from the other members of the Inkisi complex, L. nzadimalawu and the intermediate/hybrid specimens by the presence of a cornified Varicorhinus real cutting edge on the outer edge of the lower jaw in combination with the absence of barbels and poorly developed fleshy lips on the lateral side of the lower jaw vs. never with a cutting edge but instead always with a free mental lobe in combination with two pairs of well-developed barbels and well-developed fleshy lips in L. nzadimalawu; although a cornified Varicorhinus real cutting edge can be found in some specimens, this most often in combination with at leats a single pair of well-developed barbels and well-developed fleshy lips in the hybrid specimens; in addition, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. nzadimalawu by its broad mouth width, 26.8-50.5% of head length vs. 16.1-26.5%, short head length, 20.1-22.1% of standard length vs. 23.0-26.4%, long dorsal-fin base length, 14.4-17.9% of standard length vs. 12.1-16.0%, and short prepectoral distance, 20.0-22.1% of standard length vs. 22.6-26.0% (Ref. 127934). Finally, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from Acapoeta tanganicae by its low number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 57-67 (Ref. 127934). Within the adjacent Lower Guinea ichthyofaunal province, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. axelrodi, L. batesii, L. brevispinis, L. cardozoi, L. caudovittatus, L. compiniei, L. habereri, L. fimbriatus, L. jaegeri, L. malacanthus, L. mariae, L. mbami, L. micronema, mungoensis, L. roylii, L. sandersi, L. semireticulatus, L. steindachneri, L. tornieri, L. versluysii and L. werneri by its higher number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. aspius, L. lucius and L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. lower jaw clearly prognathous; and from L. rocadasi by its last unbranched dorsal-fin ray not being transformed into a well-developed spine, but instead being clearly segmented over approximately half its length, or 43.0-50.1% of dorsal-fin height vs. last unbranched dorsal-fin ray transformed into a spine, clearly segmented only at its most distal end; finally, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from Sanagia velifera by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 22-24 (Ref. 127934). Within the adjacent Quanza ichthyofaunal province, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. ansorgii, L. gulielmi, L. jubbi, L. nanningsi, L. rhinophorus, L. rosae and L. roylii by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. clarkeae, L. ensifer and L. varicostoma by the absence of papillae on the anterior edge of the lower jaw vs. with well identifiable papillae; from L. lucius and L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. lower jaw clearly prognathous; and from L. boulengeri, L. ensis, L. girardi, L. steindachneri, L. stenostoma and L. rocadasi by its last unbranched dorsal-fin ray not being transformed into a well-developed spine, but instead being clearly segmented over approximately half its length, or 43.0-50.1% of dorsal-fin height vs. last unbranched dorsal-fin ray transformed into a spine, clearly segmented only at its most distal end (Ref. 127934).

Sinh học     Tự điển (thí dụ epibenthic)

Life cycle and mating behavior Maturities | Sự tái sinh sản | Spawnings | Egg(s) | Fecundities | Ấu trùng

Main reference Upload your references | Các tài liệu tham khảo | Người điều phối | Người cộng tác

Vreven, E.J.W.M.N., T. Musschoot, E. Decru, S. Wamuini Lunkayilakio, K. Obiero, A.F. Cerwenka and U.K. Schliewen, 2018. The complex origins of mouth polymorphism in the Labeobarbus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) of the Inkisi River basin (Lower Congo, DRC, Africa): insights from an integrative approach. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 186:414-482. (Ref. 127934)

IUCN Red List Status (Ref. 130435)


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Threat to humans

  Harmless





Human uses

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

Thêm thông tin

Trophic ecology
Các loại thức ăn
Diet compositions
Food consumptions
Food rations
Các động vật ăn mồi
Population dynamics
Growths
Max. ages / sizes
Length-weight rel.
Length-length rel.
Length-frequencies
Mass conversions
Recruitments
Abundances
Life cycle
Sự tái sinh sản
Maturities
Fecundities
Spawnings
Spawning aggregations
Egg(s)
Egg developments
Ấu trùng
Sự biến động ấu trùng
Distribution
Các nước
Các khu vực của FAO
Các hệ sinh thái
Những lần xuất hiện
Những chỉ dẫn
BRUVS - Videos
Anatomy
Gill areas
Não bộ
Otoliths
Physiology
Body compositions
Nutrients
Oxygen consumptions
Dạng bơi
Swimming speeds
Visual pigment(s)
Âm thanh của cá
Diseases / Parasites
Toxicities (LC50s)
Genetics
Di truyền
Electrophoreses
Heritabilities
Human related
Aquaculture systems
Các tổng quan nuôi trồng thủy sản
Các giống
Ciguatera cases
Stamps, coins, misc.
Taxonomy
Tên thường gặp
Các synonym ( Các tên trùng)
Hình thái học
Sinh trắc học
Các tranh (Ảnh)

Các công cụ

Special reports

Download XML

Các nguồn internet

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | BOLDSystems | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: Giống, Các loài | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GenBank: genome, nucleotide | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | MitoFish | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | Cây Đời sống | Wikipedia: Go, tìm | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Tạp chí Zoological Record

Estimates based on models

Phylogenetic diversity index (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = No PD50 data   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Mức dinh dưỡng (Ref. 69278):  3.2   ±0.5 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Thích nghi nhanh (Ref. 120179):  Trung bình, thời gian nhân đôi của chủng quần tối thiểu là 1.4 - 4.4 năm (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Fishing Vulnerability (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (15 of 100).