You can sponsor this page

Listrura depinnai Villa-Verde, Ferrer & Malabarba, 2014

Adicionar o seu Fotografias e vídeos
Imagem do Google
Image of Listrura depinnai
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Trichomycteridae.

Classificação / Names Nomes comuns | Sinónimos | Catalog of Fishes(Género, Espécies) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Siluriformes (Catfishes) > Trichomycteridae (Pencil or parasitic catfishes) > Microcambevinae
Etymology: Listrura: Greek, listroo = to tie + Greek, oura = tail (Ref. 45335);  depinnai: Named for Mário C. C. de Pinna, in recognition of his significant contributions to the knowledge of fish systematics, especially on trichomycterid catfishes..

Environment: milieu / climate zone / depth range / distribution range Ecologia

; Água doce demersal. Tropical

Distribuição Países | Áreas FAO | Ecossistemas | Ocorrências | Point map | Introduções | Faunafri

South America: Rio Gravataí basin, Laguna dos Patos system in Brazil.

Tamanho / Peso / Idade

Maturity: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 3.1 cm SL macho/indeterminado; (Ref. 94748)

Descrição breve Chaves de identificação | Morfologia | Morfometria

Raios anais moles: 7 - 8; Vértebras: 45 - 46. Listrura depinnai can be readily diagnosed from other species of Listrura by the following putative autapomorphies: several spots on the region below the midline of the flank (vs. unpigmented in L. boticario, L. camposi, L.costai, and L. tetraradiata or with a slender row of small spots in L. nematopteryx and L. picinguabae); the caudal peduncle, including procurrent-ray folds, is deeper than the preanal portion of body (vs. approximately same depth); and a conspicuous intumescence adjacent to the posterodorsal margin of the pectoral-fin base (vs. swelling slight or absent). It shares the absence of a dorsal fin with L. boticario and the glanapterygines Glanapteryx, Pygidianops, and Typhlobelus, but can be readily separated from the former species by the features mentioned above and from the remaining genera by having a larger eye (9.0-10.5% HL vs. less than 6.0%, or absent) and a longer pectoral fin (11.1-11.6% SL vs. less than 5.0%, or absent). It further differs from all congeners, except L. tetraradiata, by having 45-46 vertebrae (vs. 48-55). It is further distinguished from L. tetraradiata by having 33-39 dorsal and 31-34 ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. 21-28 and 20-24, respectively), only unbranched rays on the anal and pectoral fins (vs. many branched rays), and the sensory pore of the sphenotic branch absent (vs. present). It differs further from L. costai, L. nematopteryx, and L. picinguabae by having 2 or 3 pectoral-fin rays (vs. one) and a slightly elongated, relatively deep body (body depth 12.2-12.7% SL vs. less than 10.5%); and from L. camposi by having all caudal elements almost entirely fused (vs. hypurals 1+2 not fused to hypurals 3+4+5) (Ref. 94748).

Biologia     Glossário (ex. epibenthic)

Found in a swamp with clear black water, mud and litter bottom, covered with a large amount of emerging vegetation adjacent to a dense and isolated fragment of wetland forest. Collected at a shallowsite (about 10 cm water depth above nearly 50 cm depth of submerged litter deposits) among the emerging vegetation. Other fishes captured in the same swamp include species of Cynopoecilus and Gymnotus aff. pantherinus, both are potentially new species (Ref. 94748).

Life cycle and mating behavior Maturities | Reprodução | Spawnings | Egg(s) | Fecundities | Larvas

Referência principal Upload your references | Referências | Coordenador : Pinna, Mário de | Colaboradores

Villa-Verde, L., J. Ferrer and L.R. Malabarba, 2013. A new species of Listrura from Laguna dos Patos System, Brazil: The southernmost record of the Glanapteryginae (Siluriformes: Trichomycteridae). Copeia 2013(4):641-646. (Ref. 94748)

Categoria na Lista Vermelha da IUCN (Ref. 130435)

  Preocupação menor (LC) ; Date assessed: 07 November 2018

CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Ameaça para o homem

  Harmless





Utilização humana

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

Mais informação

Trophic ecology
Itens alimentares
Diet compositions
Food consumptions
Food rations
Predadores
Ecology
Ecologia
Population dynamics
Growths
Max. ages / sizes
Length-weight rel.
Length-length rel.
Frequência de comprimento
Mass conversions
Recruitments
Abundances
Life cycle
Reprodução
Maturities
Fecundities
Spawnings
Spawning aggregations
Egg(s)
Egg developments
Larvas
Dinâmica larvar
Distribution
Países
Áreas FAO
Ecossistemas
Ocorrências
Introduções
BRUVS - Videos
Anatomy
Gill areas
Cérebros
Outras referências
Physiology
Body compositions
Nutrients
Oxygen consumptions
Tipo de natação
Swimming speeds
Visual pigment(s)
Sons de peixes
Diseases / Parasites
Toxicities (LC50s)
Genetics
Genética
Electrophoreses
Heritabilities
Human related
Aquaculture systems
Perfis para aquacultura
Estirpes
Ciguatera cases
Stamps, coins, misc.
Outreach
Colaboradores
Taxonomy
Nomes comuns
Sinónimos
Morfologia
Morfometria
Fotografias
References
Referências

Ferramentas

Relatórios especiais

Descarregue XML

Fontes da internet

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | BOLDSystems | Websites from users | Consultar FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: Género, Espécies | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GenBank: genoma, nucleotídeo | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | MitoFish | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | Árvore da vida | Wikipedia: ir para, procurar | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Registo zoológico

Estimates based on models

Phylogenetic diversity index (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = 0.5078   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight: a=0.00389 (0.00180 - 0.00842), b=3.12 (2.94 - 3.30), in cm total length, based on all LWR estimates for this body shape (Ref. 93245).
Nível Trófico (Ref. 69278):  3.1   ±0.4 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Fishing Vulnerability (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (10 of 100).